![]() |
![]() |
New Data on Hunger and Food Insecurity
The Food Research and Action Center reported
today that newly published Census Bureau/U.S. Department of Agriculture
numbers show, despite the nation's prosperity, that 31 million Americans
-- 12 million children and 19 million adults -- still suffer from
hunger or live on the edge of hunger.
The number is down significantly -- by 3.5 million -- from 1995,
the first year the federal government collected such data. FRAC
called the four-year change progress in the right direction, but
disappointingly modest, given the growth in the economy.
One large group of Americans saw their food insecurity increase.
The percentage of households with incomes between 50 and 130 percent
of the poverty level experiencing food insecurity increased. The
percentage was 27.7 in 1999, compared to 26.2 in 1995.
This confirms what a number of private and public studies have shown
-- while many families are moving from welfare to work, their earnings
are low and often they do not receive the food stamps for which
they are eligible, leaving parents and children as vulnerable or
more vulnerable to food insecurity than before.
By comparison, between 1995 and 1999, the total number of food insecure
households fell by one eighth and the number with hunger fell by
nearly a quarter.
"While we applaud any decrease in hunger, the report provides
more confirmation that a combination of low wages and drops in Food
Stamp participation are denying millions of families the basics
for a decent and healthy life," said Food Research and Action
Center President Jim Weill.
Weill also said the report underscores the urgent need for Congress
and the Administration to act this fall to pass two key Food Stamp
Program improvement bills: the Kennedy-Specter/Walsh Hunger Relief
Act (S.1805, H.R. 3192), and the Graham/Coyne-Levin Food Stamp Outreach
and Research for Kids Act (S. 1800, H.R. 2738). "These bills
are carefully targeted to help low income working families, including
those making the transition from cash assistance, escape hunger
and food insecurity," said Weill.
The general strength of the economy likely is accounting for the
overall decline of food insecurity since 1995 (the first year for
which Census/USDA made such a measurement), while the increase in
food insecurity among families with incomes below 130 percent of
the poverty level in all likelihood reflects administrative barriers
to food stamp participation and cuts that were made in the program.
There were fewer households with incomes between 50 percent and
130 percent of poverty in 1999 compared to 1995, but those who were
in this category were more likely to be food insecure.
Lynn Parker, Director of Child Nutrition at FRAC and author of FRAC
studies that were predecessors to the Census/USDA study, said, "The
pace of improvement in hunger is just too slow compared to the roaring
economy. The persistently high levels are of particular concern
because of the serious adverse health, educational and developmental
consequences of hunger and food insecurity, as well as the daily
emotional stress it adds to the lives of low-income families."
Other key data in the Census Bureau/USDA report included a mix of
good news and bad news. Among the best news was that the number
of children in food insecure households went from 12.2 million in
1995 to 10.6 million, and the number of children in hungry households
dropped from 4.1 million in 1995 to 2.64 million in 1999.
Nevertheless, children are nearly twice as likely as adults to be
living in hungry/food insecure households (16.9 percent of all children
versus 9.5 percent of all adults).
The percent of hungry/food insecure households with elderly people
went from 5 percent in 1995 to 4.8 percent in 1999. Also, hungry/food
insecure households made up of elderly people living alone changed
only slightly -- from 5.6 percent to 5.3 percent.
"Hunger is a wholly unnecessary evil in this country and this
economy," said Weill. "While more adults than ever are
working, they often are working at wages too low to support a family.
They need higher, family-supporting wages, starting with a minimum
wage increase, and they need supports like food stamps."
The President and Congress recognized in 1996 that food stamps would
be essential to supplement the wages of low-income working families,
especially those making a transition from welfare to work. But millions
of families have lost food stamps over the last four years, even
though they are still poor and struggling.
The most recent Food Stamp Program participation data continue to
show the trend. Monthly participation in the Food Stamp Program
stood at 17 million persons in June, 2000. This represented a decline
of 791,755 million persons from June 1999 and 8.1 million persons
from June 1996.
Government and private studies have shown that most of this decline
does not reflect families escaping poverty, but rather reflects
the Food Stamp Program serving a declining share of poor people.
"While we welcome any improvement in the hunger numbers, clearly
the nation must do more," Weill continued. "The economy
is healthy and very large state and federal budget surpluses are
projected. Hunger has a cure; if the nation cannot administer it
now, then when will it?"
Harmful gaps in food stamp protection under current law include
the increasingly inadequate benefit amounts for recipients, especially
families with children which have high shelter costs; unrealistic
restrictions on the value of vehicles working poor families can
own to get to work and still obtain program benefits; exclusion
from the program of most members of legal immigrant families and
of many jobless, childless adults willing to work; and state and
local practices (little information or outreach, office hours and
practices that discourage working poor families) that are making
it very difficult for low-income families to obtain food stamps
for which they are eligible.
"As states implement new welfare laws, and wages stay low,
too many people have jobs that don't pay enough to sustain a family,"
said Weill. "When these families lose food stamp benefits,
they go hungry even while working. States must reform their systems
in order to get food stamps to these eligible, hungry working families."
With this latest release, USDA food insecurity and hunger numbers
are now available for the nation for each year from 1995 through
1999. State-by-state food insecurity averages for the period 1996-1998
were released in fall, 1999. Food insecurity is defined by USDA
as lack of access to enough food to fully meet basic needs at all
times due to lack of financial resources. Food insecure households,
even when hunger is not present, are so limited in resources that
they are running out of food and can't afford balanced meals. Hungry
households are those in which adults have decreased the quality
and quantity of food they consume because of lack of money, to the
point where they are likely to be hungry on a frequent basis, or
in which children's intake has been reduced due to lack of family
financial resources, to the point that children are likely to be
hungry on a regular basis and adults' food intake is severely reduced.